<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Puppetry: Coming Soon To A Theatre Near You?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://puppetvision.info/2009/11/puppetry-coming-soon-to-a-theatre-near-you.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://puppetvision.info/2009/11/puppetry-coming-soon-to-a-theatre-near-you.html</link>
	<description>All about the best puppetry in film, video and on the web. Usually updated daily.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 17:24:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Cook</title>
		<link>http://puppetvision.info/2009/11/puppetry-coming-soon-to-a-theatre-near-you.html/comment-page-1#comment-452</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Cook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 19:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://puppetvision.info/?p=1758#comment-452</guid>
		<description>I finally saw WHERE THE WILD THINGS ARE. It had been on my to do list. But frankly, I felt some disappointment. The biggest problem for me was the jerky camera movement which induced a bit of sea-sickness or nausea. It was as dramatic a contrast to camera work in A SINGLE MAN as I could imagine.
The WILD BEINGS had the desired quality of being close to the original book ikllustrations--which was a plus. I had greater satisfaction from seeing BEING JOHN MALKOVITCH-- which pulled off making a fantastic entry into Malkovich&#039;s brain believable. And  BEING JOHN MALKOVICH was not saddled with jerky camera work.
Amplifying a short book with minimal wordage into a feature film can be a challenge. But to have the boy actually set out in a real boat in search of a wild land, instead of fnding it within the walls of his bedroom, for me, misses a point of the book.
As a kid, I travelled to space in my dreams, saw moving patterns in wallpaper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I finally saw WHERE THE WILD THINGS ARE. It had been on my to do list. But frankly, I felt some disappointment. The biggest problem for me was the jerky camera movement which induced a bit of sea-sickness or nausea. It was as dramatic a contrast to camera work in A SINGLE MAN as I could imagine.</p>
<p>The WILD BEINGS had the desired quality of being close to the original book ikllustrations&#8211;which was a plus. I had greater satisfaction from seeing BEING JOHN MALKOVITCH&#8211; which pulled off making a fantastic entry into Malkovich&#8217;s brain believable. And  BEING JOHN MALKOVICH was not saddled with jerky camera work.</p>
<p>Amplifying a short book with minimal wordage into a feature film can be a challenge. But to have the boy actually set out in a real boat in search of a wild land, instead of fnding it within the walls of his bedroom, for me, misses a point of the book.</p>
<p>As a kid, I travelled to space in my dreams, saw moving patterns in wallpaper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Cook</title>
		<link>http://puppetvision.info/2009/11/puppetry-coming-soon-to-a-theatre-near-you.html/comment-page-1#comment-450</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Cook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 19:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://puppetvision.info/?p=1758#comment-450</guid>
		<description>Two pupet films well worth seeing more than once were/are CORALINE and FANTASTIC MR. FOX. BOTH were among the best films of recent memory, both were expertly put tgether &quot;by hand&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two pupet films well worth seeing more than once were/are CORALINE and FANTASTIC MR. FOX. BOTH were among the best films of recent memory, both were expertly put tgether &#8220;by hand&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

